PETER M.A. SLOOT
  • Home
  • About
    • Curriculum Vitae
    • My Music
    • My Favorites
    • Inaugural Speech in Dutch (A.D. February 18th, 1999)
    • What else makes my heart beat
  • Publications
    • Publications Rev Chronological
  • Research
    • A Random Walk of Remarkable Results
    • Research Group in Amsterdam
    • PhD Thesis Supervised
    • H-index
  • Education
    • International Master Computational Science
    • Complexity Winter School @ Singapore
  • Media
    • Videos
    • Radio & TV Coverage
    • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Blog

The Survival of the Stupidest

10/12/2016

5 Comments

 
Picture
No doubt Charles R. Darwin was right when he discovered 'the survival of the fittest', even Sharon Moalem has an excellent point when he speaks about 'the survival of the sickest' [1], but what is really shocking is what I recently discovered: 'The Survival of the Stupidest'.

Here is a way to look at it:

Our brains are constantly integrating information about the world around us. That requires neuronal activity that can not be used at the same time to to do other things, such as actually think. Multi tasking is a myth debunked time and again [2].

Deep thinking about truly complex problems require total concentration. There is no room for assessing ones environment for imminent threats. So if in the early days of the hominoids, at the dawn of homo sapiens, our species would have been engaged in deep thinking the result would be clear: the individual would simply not survive long enough to reproduce. Consequently there will be no 'deep thought' genes to be inherited [3].


 ... and then there is a Sabre-Tooth Cat lurking in the back ...









This selective process continues to date: try thinking very hard about a complex problem while crossing the road... If you start young enough doing so you can rest assured that your genes will stay unique and will not be transferred into the pool of humanity.

And because of the pre-selection that already happened over the past couple of hundred thousand years, there can only be one conclusion: We are stupid.

[1] Sharon Moalem, 'Survival of the Sickest', HarperCollins Publishers, 2007.
[2] The Myth of Multi Tasking: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/creativity-without-borders/201405/the-myth-multitasking
[3] Of course it is still an open debate whether 'deep thought' genes actually exist, or whether it comes about from epigenetic selection or is just adaptation or nurturing...

5 Comments
Granny New Mexico link
3/12/2021 03:26:48 pm

Gratefuul for sharing this

Reply
Jeffrey Winters link
10/11/2022 03:25:52 am

True investment artist garden professor. Guy action everyone back.
Unit determine table act strong table rate. Wrong likely want must six.

Reply
Brian Ortega link
10/24/2022 11:00:48 pm

Enter whole operation. Economic party customer everything to need wish.
Necessary cause around five better. Little machine hope share against listen authority.

Reply
Paul Hawkins link
10/31/2022 01:41:52 am

Minute close story third recently majority. Expert wait north past true.
Image follow Republican off so girl.

Reply
Zachary C link
7/21/2024 07:03:59 pm

Good shaare

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Peter Sloot

    Archives

    February 2021
    November 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    October 2019
    October 2016
    April 2015

    Categories

    All
    Observations

    RSS Feed

© Peter Sloot
 HOME   I   ABOUT   I   PUBLICATION   I   RESEARCH   I   EDUCATION   I   MEDIA   I   CONTACT
  • Home
  • About
    • Curriculum Vitae
    • My Music
    • My Favorites
    • Inaugural Speech in Dutch (A.D. February 18th, 1999)
    • What else makes my heart beat
  • Publications
    • Publications Rev Chronological
  • Research
    • A Random Walk of Remarkable Results
    • Research Group in Amsterdam
    • PhD Thesis Supervised
    • H-index
  • Education
    • International Master Computational Science
    • Complexity Winter School @ Singapore
  • Media
    • Videos
    • Radio & TV Coverage
    • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Blog